|
An Inside Job
Sunday April 17, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acBixR_JRuM <
| | Posted by Harold at 8:24 PM - | |
|
|
Thursday September 9, 2010
Consider this...
"Toward the end of 'Travels With Charley,' Steinbeck makes this observation: “My own journey started long before I left, and was over before I returned. I know exactly where and when it was over. Near Abingdon, in the dog-leg of Virginia , at four o’clock of a windy afternoon, without warning or good-by or kiss my foot, my journey went away and left me stranded far from home. I tried to call it back, to catch it up—a foolish and hopeless matter, because it was definitely and permanently over and finished. It isn’t always the end point of a journey that determines its end, nor is it ever the person who takes the journey who determines it."
Anyone who’s taken a long journey knows what Steinbeck is talking about...
.........
| | Posted by Harold at 5:35 AM - | |
|
|
Saturday February 20, 2010
Message sent to Kellogg Company:
I am reading the information about "feeding America" on your cereal box of Raisin Bran. Under the headline “Kellogg is helping to feed America, “ you state there are 36 million Americans "struggling with hunger." And, you claim that Kellogg donated 53 million cereal servings to food banks in June 2009. That makes me wonder – is that a lot for your company compared to your total production?
Perhaps you could tell me your total production annually of cereal servings? I did some figuring. Let's assume each of the 36 million people struggling with hunger would greatly benefit from a cereal serving each day - that's 36 million servings x 365 days or a total of 13 billion servings. Sure doesn’t seem likely that your heart will fall out of your shirt by donating only 53 million serving annually, or have I got my math wrong?
Sure, donating something is better than nothing in the fight against hunger. But it seems to me you shouldn’t be bragging about it on your cereal box!
| | Posted by Harold at 8:11 AM - | |
|
|
Sunday December 13, 2009
Will absolutely NOT vote for him or any other Democrat or Republican except one, namely Dennis Kucinich who can be trusted. The rest are a bunch of bums and should be thrown out of their offices, tarred and feathered, and denied any pensions for Federally funded health insurance - then they should be deported to Paraguay.
| | Posted by Harold at 3:16 AM - | |
|
|
Monday April 6, 2009
"A team of nine scientists have released a startling new report on the events of 9/11, using data from dust gathered in the days and weeks after the towers came down. They discovered that scattered throughout the dust samples were red and gray chips of 'active thermitic material', or an un-reacted pyrotechnic explosive.
Thermite is used in steel welding, fireworks shows, and hand grenades. It is the combination of a metal powder and a metal oxide which produce a reaction known for extremely high temperatures focused in a very small area for a short period of time. The 'active thermitic material' discovered in the World Trade Center dust was a combination of elemental aluminum and iron oxide, and is a form of thermite known as 'nano-structured super-thermite'.
“These observations reminded us of nano-thermite fabricated at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and elsewhere; available papers describe this material as an intimate mixture of UFG[Ultra-fine grain] aluminum and iron oxide in nano-thermite composites to form pyrotechnics or explosives."
Commercially available thermite behaves as an incendiary when ignited, but when the ingredients are ultra-fine grain and are intimately mixed, this 'nano-thermite' reacts very rapidly, even explosively, and is sometimes referred to as 'super-thermite',” the report explains.
The full article in The Open Chemical Physics Journal can be found here.
Some of the authors of the paper have lost their jobs at universities and chemistry labs for their outspoken breakdown of what happened at the World Trade Center on 9/11. Kevin Ryan lost his job as a lab director after writing a letter to the National Institute for Standards and Technology(NIST was conducting an investigation into 9/11 at the time) challenging the common theory that burning jet fuel weakened the steel supports holding up the 110-story skyscrapers.
Ryan claims that the owner of his laboratory subsidiary "was the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings,” according to the South Bend Tribune. Dr. Steven E. Jones, a physicist at Brigham Young University, presented a paper in 2005 discussing alternative theories to the commonly accepted 'jet fuel' reasoning.
In September 2006 he was placed on paid administrative leave and his paper was removed from the BYU database.
Jones has told Visibility911.com, "In short, the paper explodes the official story that 'no evidence' exists for explosive/pyrotechnic materials in the WTC buildings."
It remains to be seen if this study will encourage further investigation into the events of 9/11, or if anyone will come forth with a legitimate reason as to why nano-structured super-thermite can be found in dust produced by the collapse of the World Trade Centers."
..above article from Raw Story....
| | Posted by Harold at 8:31 PM - | |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
| |
1754 Visitors
|